From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Inglet v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, San Angelo Division
Sep 17, 2009
Civil Action No. 6:08-CV-014-C (N.D. Tex. Sep. 17, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 6:08-CV-014-C.

September 17, 2009


ORDER


THIS MATTER comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation filed August 28, 2009 (Doc. 29). No written objections have been filed.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the findings and conclusions in the Report and Recommendation are ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the court and that this cause is reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to 405 U.S.C. § 405(g).

Upon remand, the ALJ should clearly consider each of the six factors set forth in 20 C.F.R. § 404.1527(d)(2) and/or consider whether to obtain or update an opinion of a treating or examining physician regarding Plaintiff's impairments and limitations


Summaries of

Inglet v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, San Angelo Division
Sep 17, 2009
Civil Action No. 6:08-CV-014-C (N.D. Tex. Sep. 17, 2009)
Case details for

Inglet v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ALTON M. INGLET, JR., Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, San Angelo Division

Date published: Sep 17, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 6:08-CV-014-C (N.D. Tex. Sep. 17, 2009)

Citing Cases

Shorey v. Astrue

Id. He cites no record evidence in support of the second assertion, but merely repeating a single grade in…