From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingle v. Fitzharris

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 7, 1969
411 F.2d 611 (9th Cir. 1969)

Opinion

No. 23057.

May 7, 1969.

Richard Lee Ingle, pro se, appellant.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before HAMLEY, KOELSCH, and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.


This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying a writ of habeas corpus after an evidentiary hearing held pursuant to our mandate in Ingle v. Fitzharris, 375 F.2d 398 (9th Cir., 1967). The factual issues identified in our opinion were fully explored at the hearing. The district court found that the evidence failed to sustain appellant's allegations. Appellant merely reasserts the allegations rejected below. The record discloses no reason to disturb the district court's findings.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Ingle v. Fitzharris

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 7, 1969
411 F.2d 611 (9th Cir. 1969)
Case details for

Ingle v. Fitzharris

Case Details

Full title:Richard Lee INGLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Cletus J. FITZHARRIS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 7, 1969

Citations

411 F.2d 611 (9th Cir. 1969)

Citing Cases

McNamara v. State

In the circumstances of this case, the trial court's finding is not erroneous. See Ingle v. Fitzharris, 283…

Maynard v. Meachum

Thus, whether Maynard's decision was voluntary will turn on whether his objections to his appointed counsel…