From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingersoll v. Trans Union Corporation

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Nov 3, 2005
Case No. 04-4986 SI (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. 04-4986 SI.

November 3, 2005

Neil A. Goteiner (State Bar No. 83524) Andrew W. Ingersoll (State Bar No. 221348) Farella Braun Martel LLP San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff ANDREW W. INGERSOLL

CROWELL MORING LLP Donald Bradley Attorneys for Defendant TRANS UNION CORPORATION


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT TRANS UNION CORPORATION


Whereas Plaintiff and Defendant Trans Union Corporation ("Trans Union") have reached a final and binding settlement of all claims alleged in, or which could have been asserted in, the above-captioned action,

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Trans Union, by and through their respective counsel that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), the claims against Trans Union in the above-captioned action be, and hereby are, dismissed in their entirety, with prejudice.

Each party is to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs in accordance with the Settlement Agreement.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ingersoll v. Trans Union Corporation

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Nov 3, 2005
Case No. 04-4986 SI (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2005)
Case details for

Ingersoll v. Trans Union Corporation

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW W. INGERSOLL, Plaintiff, v. TRANS UNION CORPORATION, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Nov 3, 2005

Citations

Case No. 04-4986 SI (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2005)