From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingalsbe v. Chicago Insurance Company [3d Dept 2000

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 7, 2000
(N.Y. App. Div. Dec. 7, 2000)

Opinion

December 7, 2000.

Motion for resettlement of order dated and entered March 16, 2000.


DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted, without costs, only to the extent that the decretal paragraph of the order is amended to read as follows:

ORDERED that the order is modified, on the law, without costs, by reversing so much thereof as granted plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment; said motion denied and it is declared that defendants Home Insurance Company and Chicago Insurance Company did not have an obligation to defend plaintiff in the underlying malpractice action; and, as so modified, affirmed.


Summaries of

Ingalsbe v. Chicago Insurance Company [3d Dept 2000

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 7, 2000
(N.Y. App. Div. Dec. 7, 2000)
Case details for

Ingalsbe v. Chicago Insurance Company [3d Dept 2000

Case Details

Full title:WARD W. INGALSBE JR., Respondent, v. CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 7, 2000

Citations

(N.Y. App. Div. Dec. 7, 2000)