Opinion
2:22-cv-01244-APG-BNW
08-30-2022
INFOBIP, LTD., a United Kingdom Private Limited Company, Plaintiff, v. RINGCAPTCHA, INC., a foreign Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, Defendants.
HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC, JOHN J. SAVAGE, ESQ. Counsel for Defendant Ringcaptcha, Inc. GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI LLP, SEAN P. FLYNN, ESQ., THIERRY V. BARKLEY, ESQ. Counsel for Plaintiff Infobip, Ltd.
HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC, JOHN J. SAVAGE, ESQ. Counsel for Defendant Ringcaptcha, Inc.
GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI LLP, SEAN P. FLYNN, ESQ., THIERRY V. BARKLEY, ESQ. Counsel for Plaintiff Infobip, Ltd.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT RINGCAPTCHA, INC. TO RESPOND TO INFOBIP, LTD.'S COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST)
The parties, through counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
Defendant RINGCAPTCHA, INC. (“Defendant”), shall have an extension of time until and including September 9, 2022, in which to file its Answer or other responsive pleading to Plaintiff INFOBIP, LTD.'s (“Plaintiff”') Complaint.
The need to enlarge time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is based on the following factors. Defendant retained Nevada counsel only two days before its response to the Complaint was due. The additional time requested will permit Defendant's counsel to collect documents and information necessary for an informed response to the Complaint.
This stipulation is brought in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
IT IS SO ORDERED