Opinion
38 CA 17–01456
02-02-2018
Richard INFARINATO, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. ROCHESTER TELEPHONE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants, and Frontier Telephone of Rochester, Inc., as Successor in Interest to Rochester Telephone Corporation, Defendant–Respondent.
CHENEY & BLAIR, LLP, GENEVA (DAVID D. BENZ OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF–APPELLANT. THE GLENNON LAW FIRM, P.C., ROCHESTER (PETER J. GLENNON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–RESPONDENT.
CHENEY & BLAIR, LLP, GENEVA (DAVID D. BENZ OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF–APPELLANT.
THE GLENNON LAW FIRM, P.C., ROCHESTER (PETER J. GLENNON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–RESPONDENT.
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, CARNI, DEJOSEPH, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Kuhn v. Kuhn, 129 A.D.2d 967, 967, 514 N.Y.S.2d 284 [4th Dept. 1987] ; see also CPLR 5701[a][2][iv] ).