From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Infantino v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 24, 2014
116 A.D.3d 1305 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-04-24

In the Matter of Michael INFANTINO, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Michael Infantino, Rochester, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.


Michael Infantino, Rochester, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in St. Lawrence County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a disciplinary determination finding him guilty of stealing. Contrary to petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report and testimony at the hearing, including admissions by petitioner, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Accardi v. Goord, 34 A.D.3d 945, 946, 823 N.Y.S.2d 315 [2006] ). To the extent that petitioner challenges the use of a speaker phone to receive testimony, this argument was not preserved for our review by any objection at the hearing ( see Matter of Murphy v. Goord, 272 A.D.2d 730, 730, 708 N.Y.S.2d 916 [2000];Matter of Rizzuto v. Coombe, 225 A.D.2d 961, 962, 639 N.Y.S.2d 582 [1996] ).

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed. LAHTINEN, J.P., McCARTHY, GARRY and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Infantino v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 24, 2014
116 A.D.3d 1305 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Infantino v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Michael INFANTINO, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 24, 2014

Citations

116 A.D.3d 1305 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 2814
983 N.Y.S.2d 908

Citing Cases

Mitchell v. Rodriguez

Accordingly, as petitioner was not prejudiced by the consideration of the confidential information, we find…

Kim v. Annucci

Initially, inasmuch as he pleaded guilty to possessing an altered item, petitioner is precluded from…