Inergetic AB v. Murata Mfg. Co.

Full title: INERGETIC AB, Appellant v. MURATA MANUFACTURING CO., LTD., Appellee

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Sep 2, 2021

No. 2020-2185 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 2, 2021)

Opinion

2020-2185

09-02-2021

INERGETIC AB, Appellant v. MURATA MANUFACTURING CO., LTD., Appellee

DAVID CHAVOUS, Chavous Intellectual Property Law LLC, Boxford, MA, argued for appellant. Also represented by DAVID ANTHONY GIORDANO, Giordano Law LLC, Boston, MA. ANGELA OLIVER, Haynes &Boone, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by ADAM CARL FOWLES, Plano, TX; GREGORY J. MICHELSON, Costa Mesa, CA.

PER CURIAM

This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019-00502.

DAVID CHAVOUS, Chavous Intellectual Property Law LLC, Boxford, MA, argued for appellant. Also represented by DAVID ANTHONY GIORDANO, Giordano Law LLC, Boston, MA.

ANGELA OLIVER, Haynes &Boone, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by ADAM CARL FOWLES, Plano, TX; GREGORY J. MICHELSON, Costa Mesa, CA.

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM

(DYK, LINN, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.