From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Industrial Commission v. Vail

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 13, 1924
110 Ohio St. 304 (Ohio 1924)

Summary

In Industrial Commission v. Vail, 110 Ohio St. 301, 143 N.E. 7161, it was held that an application for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Law, filed with the Industrial Commission prior to the effective date of an amendment to that law, is a proceeding within the provision of Section 26, and that therefore the amendment is not applicable in the trial of such action.

Summary of this case from State, ex Rel. v. Weiler

Opinion

Nos. 18148 and 18149

Decided May 13, 1924.

Workmen's compensation — Appeal to common pleas court — Evidence not limited to record — Amended Section 1465-90, General Code — Pending action — Section 26, General Code.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.

Mr. Edward C. Stanton, prosecuting attorney; Mr. George C. Hansen; Mr. C.C. Crabbe, attorney general, and Mr. R.R. Zurmehly, for plaintiff in error in No. 18148.

Mr. A.C. Hasse, for defendant in error.

Mr. Edward C. Stanton, prosecuting attorney; Mr. George C. Hansen; Mr. C.C. Crabbe, attorney general, and Mr. R.R. Zurmehly, for plaintiff in error, in No. 18149.

Messrs. Landfear, Baskin Fleharty, for defendant in error.


An application for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Law (Gen. Code, Sections 1465-37 to 1465-108) filed with the Industrial Commission of Ohio prior to August 16, 1921, the date the amendment to Section 1465-90, General Code, became effective, is a proceeding, within the provisions of Section 26, General Code, which ripens into an action upon an appeal from a denial of such claim by the Industrial Commission, and the amendment is not applicable in the trial of such action.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed in both cases.

Judgments affirmed.

MARSHALL, C.J., ROBINSON, JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

WANAMAKER, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Industrial Commission v. Vail

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 13, 1924
110 Ohio St. 304 (Ohio 1924)

In Industrial Commission v. Vail, 110 Ohio St. 301, 143 N.E. 7161, it was held that an application for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Law, filed with the Industrial Commission prior to the effective date of an amendment to that law, is a proceeding within the provision of Section 26, and that therefore the amendment is not applicable in the trial of such action.

Summary of this case from State, ex Rel. v. Weiler
Case details for

Industrial Commission v. Vail

Case Details

Full title:INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO v. VAIL. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO v…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: May 13, 1924

Citations

110 Ohio St. 304 (Ohio 1924)
143 N.E. 716

Citing Cases

Stough v. Indus. Comm

The filing of an application for compensation with the Industrial Commission constitutes the commencement of…

Philadelphia Nat. Bank v. Raff

4 F. Supp. 230. The appellant contends (1) that by virtue of section 26 it had six months from the date of…