From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Industrial Commission v. Hunt

Supreme Court of Arizona
Mar 6, 1941
111 P.2d 67 (Ariz. 1941)

Opinion

Civil No. 4370.

Filed March 6, 1941.

WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION. — Employees of the Industrial Commission whose employment and compensation have once been approved by the governor are entitled to be paid their salaries without submission by the commission of such employment and salaries to each incoming governor for his approval.

See 22 R.C.L. 458.

Original proceeding in Mandamus. Alternative writ made peremptory.

Mr. Rouland W. Hill and Mr. Howard A. Twitty, for Plaintiff.

Mr. Joe Conway, Attorney General, and Mr. Earl Anderson, Assistant Attorney General, for Defendant.


The question involved in this case and in McGinness v. Hunt, ante, p. 70, 111 P.2d 65, is identical, that is, as to whether employees of the Industrial Commission whose employment and compensation have once been approved by the governor of the state are entitled to be paid their salaries, or must the commission submit such employment and salaries to each incoming governor and secure his approval before they may be paid their salaries.

The only difference in the cases is that this one is prosecuted by the Industrial Commission in behalf of all its employees. The attorney general and attorneys for the commission have stipulated that the decision in the McGinness case should control this case.

The alternative writ is made peremptory as to all employees of the commission except McGinness, who secured judgment for the payment of his salary in his own case, supra.

LOCKWOOD, C.J., and McALISTER and ROSS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Industrial Commission v. Hunt

Supreme Court of Arizona
Mar 6, 1941
111 P.2d 67 (Ariz. 1941)
Case details for

Industrial Commission v. Hunt

Case Details

Full title:THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Plaintiff, v. JOE HUNT, Treasurer of…

Court:Supreme Court of Arizona

Date published: Mar 6, 1941

Citations

111 P.2d 67 (Ariz. 1941)
111 P.2d 67