From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Inderlied v. Whaley

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 10, 1898
156 N.Y. 658 (N.Y. 1898)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Inderlied v. Whaley (85 Hun 63, affd. 156 N.Y. 658), it was held that since a plaintiff could have demanded damages in the injunction action and did not do so, he was precluded from suing for them in a later action.

Summary of this case from Maflo Holding Corp. v. S.J. Blume, Inc.
See 2 Summaries

Opinion

Argued April 20, 1898

Decided May 10, 1898

D.H. Hanford for appellants.

Levi H. Brown for respondents.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.

All concur, except MARTIN, J., not sitting.

Summaries of

Inderlied v. Whaley

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 10, 1898
156 N.Y. 658 (N.Y. 1898)

In Inderlied v. Whaley (85 Hun 63, affd. 156 N.Y. 658), it was held that since a plaintiff could have demanded damages in the injunction action and did not do so, he was precluded from suing for them in a later action.

Summary of this case from Maflo Holding Corp. v. S.J. Blume, Inc.

In Inderlied v. Whaley (85 Hun 63, affd. 156 N.Y. 658), it was held that since a plaintiff could have demanded damages in the injunction action and did not do so, he was precluded from suing for them in a later action.

Summary of this case from Matter of Brandt
Case details for

Inderlied v. Whaley

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN F. INDERLIED et al., Appellants, v . NICHOLAS WHALEY et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 10, 1898

Citations

156 N.Y. 658 (N.Y. 1898)

Citing Cases

Syracuse Salt Co. v. R., W. O.R.R. Co.

And in conjunction with the claim to recover for the trespasses past was an averment that the defendant…

Matter of Brandt

The plaintiff is precluded from suing for damages upon the first cause of action of the complaint herein. In…

4 Citing Cases