From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Incorp Servs., Inc. v. Nev. Corporate Servs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 4, 2013
Case No.: 2:09-cv-01300-GMN-CWH (D. Nev. Jan. 4, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:09-cv-01300-GMN-CWH

01-04-2013

INCORP SERVICES, INC., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff, v. NEVADA CORPORATE SERVICES, INC., a Nevada corporation, RICHARD FRITZLER, an individual, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendant.


MINUTE ORDER

Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2 of the Local Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Defendants' must file their points and authorities in response to Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss within fourteen (14) days after service of the motion. LCR 7-2(b). However, the date provided in Plaintiff's Motion for Order Shortening Time on Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 189) falls after the deadline by which Defendants must file their opposition to the Motion to Dismiss. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for an Order Shortening Time (ECF No. 189) is DENIED.

________________________

Gloria M. Navarro

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Incorp Servs., Inc. v. Nev. Corporate Servs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 4, 2013
Case No.: 2:09-cv-01300-GMN-CWH (D. Nev. Jan. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Incorp Servs., Inc. v. Nev. Corporate Servs., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:INCORP SERVICES, INC., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff, v. NEVADA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 4, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 2:09-cv-01300-GMN-CWH (D. Nev. Jan. 4, 2013)