From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Income Prop. Consultants Inc. v. Lumat Realty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 1982
88 A.D.2d 582 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

May 3, 1982


In an action to recover a real estate broker's commission, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Robbins, J.), dated April 23, 1981, which denied their motion to vacate a default judgment which had been entered against them in the principal amount of $20,000. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. In the absence of either a verified complaint or an affidavit by the party setting forth "the facts constituting the claim, the default and the amount due" as required by CPLR 3215 (subd [e]), the entry of a default judgment in the instant case was a nullity and must be vacated (see Natemeier v. Heim, 81 A.D.2d 1008; Georgia Pacific Corp. v. Bailey, 77 A.D.2d 682; Union Nat. Bank v Davis, 67 A.D.2d 1034). Accordingly, any consideration of the further issues of excusable default and the presence or absence of a meritorious defense has been rendered unnecessary. Damiani, J.P., Titone, Gulotta and Bracken, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Income Prop. Consultants Inc. v. Lumat Realty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 1982
88 A.D.2d 582 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Income Prop. Consultants Inc. v. Lumat Realty

Case Details

Full title:INCOME PROPERTY CONSULTANTS INC., Respondent, v. LUMAT REALTY CORP. et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 3, 1982

Citations

88 A.D.2d 582 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

Zelnik v. Bidermann Industries U.S.A., Inc.

It is clear from the disposition in the case that no inquest had been conducted and, on appeal, the…

Mullins v. Dilorenzo

This Court has held that a complaint verified by counsel amounts to no more than an attorney's affidavit and…