From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Income Fund of Boston, Inc. v. Vahlsing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 25, 1975
49 A.D.2d 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

September 25, 1975


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 8, 1975, denying defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of in personam jurisdiction or forum non conveniens, unanimously affirmed. Respondent shall recover of appellant $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. This suit was instituted to recover on the personal guarantee of the defendant. Neither party to this action "does business" in New York State, nor does either maintain residence in any State common to both plaintiff and defendant. However, the preliminary negotiations and the execution of the note sued upon took place in New York, and the note itself specifies that it is payable in New York and its terms are to be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. Under these circumstances, both parties' nexus with New York in regard to the subject matter of this suit is sufficient for our courts to retain jurisdiction.

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Markewich, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.


Summaries of

Income Fund of Boston, Inc. v. Vahlsing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 25, 1975
49 A.D.2d 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Income Fund of Boston, Inc. v. Vahlsing

Case Details

Full title:INCOME FUND OF BOSTON, INC., Respondent, v. F.H. VAHLSING, JR., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 25, 1975

Citations

49 A.D.2d 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

Waterways Limited v. Bar-clays Bank PLC

We note that, although defendant is incorporated in the United Kingdom, it is authorized to do business in…

Unitech USA, Inc. v. Ponsoldt

NARC shows a New Jersey headquarters. Plaintiff's principal is a British subject. Where all of the parties…