From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Incardona v.Roer

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 29, 2012
37 A.3d 746 (Conn. 2012)

Opinion

2012-02-29

Karen INCARDONA, Administratrix (Estate of Hazel Smart), et al. v. David ROER et al.Karen Incardona, Administratrix (Estate of Hazel Smart), et al. v. Saint Mary's Hospital et al.

Karen L. Dowd and Brendon P. Levesque, Hartford, in support of the petition. *747 Augustus R. Southworth III, Waterbury, and Todd R. Michaels, in opposition.


Karen L. Dowd and Brendon P. Levesque, Hartford, in support of the petition. *747 Augustus R. Southworth III, Waterbury, and Todd R. Michaels, in opposition.

The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 33960) is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly dismiss the plaintiffs' appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction?”

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

Incardona v.Roer

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 29, 2012
37 A.3d 746 (Conn. 2012)
Case details for

Incardona v.Roer

Case Details

Full title:Karen INCARDONA, Administratrix (Estate of Hazel Smart), et al. v. David…

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Feb 29, 2012

Citations

37 A.3d 746 (Conn. 2012)
304 Conn. 904

Citing Cases

Incardona v. Roer

The court subsequently granted the motion to substitute Incardona, executrix of the estate of Harold Smart,…