From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Williams v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 23, 2004
4 A.D.3d 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-08996.

Decided February 23, 2004.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to vacate certain rulings of the trial court during the trial of a criminal action entitled People v. Williams, in the Supreme Court, Westchester County, under Indictment No. 1154/02, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

Jomo Williams, Valhalla, N.Y., petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General, New York, N.Y. (Constantine A. Speres of counsel), for respondent, Mary H. Smith.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., DANIEL F. LUCIANO, WILLIAM F. MASTRO and REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION, ORDER JUDGMENT

Upon the papers filed in support of the proceeding and application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is,

ORDERED that the application for poor person relief is granted; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought ( see Matter of Legal Aid Society of Sullivan County v. Scheinman, 53 N.Y.2d 12, 16). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

FLORIO, J.P., LUCIANO, MASTRO and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Williams v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 23, 2004
4 A.D.3d 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

In the Matter of Williams v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JOMO WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. MARY H. SMITH, ETC., ET…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 23, 2004

Citations

4 A.D.3d 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
771 N.Y.S.2d 717