Opinion
Case No. BK09-40975-TLS.
8-14-2009
IN THE MATTER OF: MICHAEL D. WHITMORE and MELANIE B. WHITMORE, Chapter 13, Debtor(s).
This matter is before the court on the debtors' second renewed motion to avoid the lien of Citifinancial (Fil. #31). No objection was filed. Paul D. Boross represents the debtors.
The debtors have moved to avoid Citifinancial's nonpossessory, nonpurchase money security interest in their 2005 Chrysler Pacifica vehicle under 11 U.S.C. 522(f)(1)(B)(ii). To avoid Citifinancial's lien, the debtors must establish that (1) the creditor has a security interest in the vehicle; (2) the creditor's interest is a nonpossessory, nonpurchase money security interest; (3) the debtors are entitled to exempt the vehicle as a tool of the trade; and (4) the creditor's lien impairs the exemption in the vehicle. Ginter v. Alliant Bank (In re Ginter), 349 B.R. 193, 197 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2006).
That section provides:
Citifinancial holds an allowed secured claim of $8,278.87. The value of the car, according to the debtors' schedules, is $9,500.00. They claim a tool-of-the-trade exemption of $2,400.00 and a personal property exemption of $2,500.00 in the vehicle. See Amended Schedule C (Fil. #30). Section 25-1556(4) of the Nebraska Revised Statutes permits a debtor to exempt up to $2,400.00 in tools of the trade, which can include a motor vehicle. Therefore, the debtors may avoid the fixing of Citifinancial's lien to the extent it impairs the § 25-1556(4) exemption in the vehicle. They may not use § 522(f)(1)(B) to protect any part of the personal property exemption. In re Vasina, 337 B.R. 684, 686 (Bankr. D. Neb. 2006).
IT IS ORDERED: The debtors' second renewed motion to avoid the lien of Citifinancial (Fil. #31) is granted. The lien on the 2005 Chrysler Pacifica is avoided only to the extent it impairs the debtors' tool-of-the-trade exemption.
(f)(1) Notwithstanding any waiver of exemptions but subject to paragraph (3), the debtor may avoid the fixing of a lien on an interest of the debtor in property to the extent that such lien impairs an exemption to which the debtor would have been entitled under subsection (b) of this section, if such lien is
. . .
(B) a nonpossessory, nonpurchase-money security interest in any
. . .
(ii) implements, professional books, or tools, of the trade of the debtor or the trade of a dependent of the debtor[.]