From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Warren v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 30, 2006
34 A.D.3d 1144 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

No. 500390.

November 30, 2006.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur.


Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possessing contraband and altered items after three makeshift weapons that were made from state pens and sharpened pieces of flat metal were found in his cell. He was found guilty of the charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing. The determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, resulting in this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the items retrieved from petitioner's cell, constitute substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see e.g. Matter of Ramirez v Goord, 32 AD3d 601, 601; Matter of Morales v Goord, 290 AD2d 790, 791). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claim that he was improperly denied the opportunity to call witnesses, have not been preserved for our review due to his failure to raise them at the hearing ( see Matter of Burgess v Goord, 30 AD3d 877, 878).

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Warren v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 30, 2006
34 A.D.3d 1144 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In the Matter of Warren v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES WARREN, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 30, 2006

Citations

34 A.D.3d 1144 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
824 N.Y.S.2d 496

Citing Cases

Alicea v. Smith

Remittal for a redetermination of the penalty imposed is unnecessary as no loss of good time was recommended…