Opinion
3782N.
Decided June 1, 2004.
Order, Surrogate's Court, New York County (Eve Preminger, S.), entered on or about November 18, 2003, which denied the cross motion of respondents Yien Koo King, Kenneth King and Cy Art, Ltd. to modify a temporary restraining order to permit the sale or disposition of 93 works of art, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Ethel Griffin, Public Administrator of the County of New York, as Temporary Administrator of the Estate of Chi-Chuan Wang, etc., Petitioner-Respondent, Yien Koo King, et al., Respondents-Appellants, Andrew Wang, et al., Respondents-Respondents.
Phillips Nizer LLP, New York (Stuart A. Summmit of counsel), for appellants.
Schram Carew, P.C., New York (Peter S. Schram of counsel), for Ethel J. Griffin, respondent.
Brown Raysman Millstein Felder Steiner LLP, New York (John J. Gallagher of counsel), for Andrew Wang and Shou-Kung Wang, respondents.
Before: Buckley, P.J., Tom, Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Ellerin, JJ.
In light of the circumstances presented in this bitter family dispute over the estate of the artist and collector Chi-Chuan Wang, the temporary restraining order, originally issued on consent, should remain undisturbed so as to preserve the status quo while petitioner conducts the SCPA 2103 discovery proceeding and determines what property belongs to the estate ( see Danae Art Intl., Inc. v. Stallone, 163 A.D.2d 81).
We have considered respondents-appellants' remaining contentions and find them unavailing.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.