From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Valentine v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 23, 2005
19 A.D.3d 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

96738.

June 23, 2005.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of the Superintendent of Lyon Mountain Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Chaun Valentine, Malone, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Carpinello and Kane, JJ., concur.


Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit harassment and refusing a direct order. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and no longer is aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Garcia v. Portuondo, 308 AD2d 621).

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Valentine v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 23, 2005
19 A.D.3d 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In the Matter of Valentine v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CHAUN VALENTINE, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 23, 2005

Citations

19 A.D.3d 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
796 N.Y.S.2d 924

Citing Cases

Garofolo v. Goord

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively…