From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Urena v. Perlman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 17, 2006
27 A.D.3d 1140 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

TP 05-01021.

March 17, 2006.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County [Samuel D. Hester, J.], entered April 25, 2005) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a Tier II hearing that petitioner had violated an inmate rule.

RAFAEL URENA, PETITIONER PRO SE.

ELIOT SPITZER, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (WAYNE L. BENJAMIN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Present: Hurlbutt, J.P., Gorski, Martoche, Smith and Hayes, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that said proceeding be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs as moot ( see Matter of Free v. Coombe, 234 AD2d 996).


Summaries of

In the Matter of Urena v. Perlman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 17, 2006
27 A.D.3d 1140 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In the Matter of Urena v. Perlman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RAFAEL URENA, Petitioner, v. KENNETH S. PERLMAN, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 17, 2006

Citations

27 A.D.3d 1140 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 1990
810 N.Y.S.2d 716