Opinion
2004-08582.
November 21, 2005.
In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Elkins, J.), dated September 10, 2004, as, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated August 16, 2004, made after a hearing, found that she neglected her child.
Kenneth M. Tuccillo, New York, N.Y., for appellant.
Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Leonard Koerner and Larry A. Sonnenshein of counsel), for respondent.
Steven Banks, New York, N.Y. (Daniel Greenbaum of counsel), Law Guardian for the child.
Before: Adams, J.P., Luciano, Mastro and Lunn, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
Family Court Act § 1046 (b) (i) requires that a finding of neglect of a child be supported by a preponderance of the evidence ( see Matter of Tammie Z., 66 NY2d 1). We conclude that the finding of neglect with respect to the child was supported by a preponderance of the evidence.
The mother's remaining contentions are without merit.