From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Till

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 9, 2001
770 A.2d 1153 (N.J. 2001)

Opinion

May 9, 2001.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-057 concluding that PETER W. TILL of

BLOOMFIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence) and RPC 8.4(c) (dishonesty, fraud, deceit of misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that PETER W. TILL is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

In re Till

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 9, 2001
770 A.2d 1153 (N.J. 2001)
Case details for

In re Till

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF PETER W. TILL, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: May 9, 2001

Citations

770 A.2d 1153 (N.J. 2001)
770 A.2d 1153

Citing Cases

In re Winston

See, e.g., In re Singer, 200 N.J. 263 (2009) (attorney misrepresented to his client for a period of four…

In re Tan

See, e.g., In re Singer, 200 N.J. 263 (2009) (attorney misrepresented to his client for a period of four…