From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Tiffany

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 9, 2005
19 A.D.3d 176 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

6298.

June 9, 2005.

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Susan R. Larabee, J.), entered on or about December 2, 2004, which, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant failed to comply with the terms of her probation, revoked a prior order of disposition that had placed appellant on probation, and instead placed her in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Presentment Agency Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Amy Hausknecht of counsel), for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Grace Goodman of counsel), for presentment agency.

Before: Friedman, J.P., Nardelli, Williams, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.


The court properly concluded that a residential placement with emphasis on sex offender therapy and counseling was the least restrictive alternative consistent with appellant's best interests, as well as those of the community ( see Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947), where probation had already failed ( see Matter of Michael OO., 269 AD2d 633). The court properly considered the probation and psychiatric reports and all the relevant factors including appellant's noncompliance with probation.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Tiffany

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 9, 2005
19 A.D.3d 176 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In the Matter of Tiffany

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TIFFANY H., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 9, 2005

Citations

19 A.D.3d 176 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
798 N.Y.S.2d 392

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Alfredo H

Ordered that the order of disposition and the orders dated October 12, 2004, are affirmed, without costs or…

In re Jerwin R

The court's determination that appellant violated the conditions of his probation to an extent warranting…