From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Thomas v. Coombs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 22, 2002
290 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

1999-07900

Submitted December 18, 2001.

January 22, 2002.

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Segal, J.), dated August 13, 1999, which denied the father's motion to vacate an order of protection of the same court (Grosvenor, J.), dated March 11, 1998, entered upon his default in appearing for a hearing.

Peter Dailey, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., THOMAS A. ADAMS, SANDRA L. TOWNES, A. GAIL PRUDENTI, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly denied the father's motion to vacate an order of protection entered upon his default in appearing for a hearing on the mother's petition. He demonstrated neither a reasonable excuse for his default nor a meritorious defense to the petition (see, CPLR 5015[a][1]; Matter of Helen T. v. Roosevelt B., 256 A.D.2d 583).

ALTMAN, J.P., ADAMS, TOWNES and PRUDENTI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Thomas v. Coombs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 22, 2002
290 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

In the Matter of Thomas v. Coombs

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF RUTH THOMAS, respondent, v. ARTHUR COOMBS, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 22, 2002

Citations

290 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
736 N.Y.S.2d 264

Citing Cases

Territo v. Keane

The Family Court properly denied the husband's motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) to vacate an order of…