From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of the Estate of Bilse

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Mar 10, 2000
329 N.J. Super. 118 (App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

A-4361-98T3.

Submitted February 14, 2000.

Decided March 10, 2000.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division — Probate Part, Union County.

Before Judges HAVEY and A.A. RODRIGUEZ.

Friedman, Sherwin Scarola, attorneys for appellant Robert Bilse (Vanessa L. Koppel, on the brief).

Reussille, Mausner, Carotenuto, Barger Steel, attorneys for respondents Anthony F. Carlo, IV, Daniel Carlo, Lauren Carlo, Anthony Joseph Carlo, Daniel Michael Carlo and Ashley Carlo (Derrick A. Scenna, on the brief).


Wilma Bilse (Wilma) died testate on June 30, 1998. By Order to Show Cause and Verified Complaint filed November 30, 1998, her husband, Leo Bilse (Leo) sought an elective share of Wilma's estate pursuant to N.J.S.A. 3B:8-15. Leo died testate on December 11, 1998. Robert J. Bilse (Robert), executor of Leo's estate, was substituted as plaintiff to pursue Leo's elective share claim.

By written opinion, Judge Boyle in the Chancery Division, Probate Part, determined that Leo's estate may pursue his elective share only to the extent that the share was necessary for Leo's support for the period between Wilma's and Leo's deaths. An order of dismissal was entered and plaintiff now appeals.

We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth by Judge Boyle in his comprehensive opinion rendered on March 8, 1999, and reported at 329 N.J. Super. 158, 746 A.2d 1090 (Ch.Div. 2000).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

In the Matter of the Estate of Bilse

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Mar 10, 2000
329 N.J. Super. 118 (App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

In the Matter of the Estate of Bilse

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF WILMA BILSE, DECEASED

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Mar 10, 2000

Citations

329 N.J. Super. 118 (App. Div. 2000)
746 A.2d 1068

Citing Cases

In re Estate of Brown

Contrary to Thomas's position, this is not a matter involving a creditor seeking to recover against a…