From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of the Claim of Schreiber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 9, 2006
27 A.D.3d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

98869.

March 9, 2006.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 18, 2004, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Walter, Thayer Mishler, P.C., Albany (Lanny E. Walter of counsel), for appellant.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, New York City (Gary Leibowitz of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.


Claimant worked for a school district as a teacher's aide and bus monitor. Part of her duties included accompanying a disabled student on the bus between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 10:00 A.M. When such student was not on the bus, claimant was to report to the assistant superintendent's office for reassignment. The student was not on the bus on February 2 or 3, 2004, but claimant did not obtain a reassignment. Rather, on February 2, 2004, she waited outside the assistant superintendent's office for 20 minutes and then went to a first grade classroom and, on February 3, 2004, she went to the faculty lounge where she had a snack and then proceeded to the computer room where she checked e-mail and gathered information on discrimination. Claimant was terminated as a result and thereafter applied for unemployment insurance benefits. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denied her claim on the basis that she was terminated due to misconduct. Claimant appeals.

We affirm. The failure to comply with an employer's reasonable request may constitute disqualifying misconduct ( see Matter of Bowen [Commissioner of Labor], 20 AD3d 642; Matter of Pearlstein [Engstrand — Commissioner of Labor], 16 AD3d 947, 947). It is undisputed that claimant did not report to the office as required on the dates in question and, on at least one of those dates, engaged in activities of a personal nature. In view of this, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board's decision.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In the Matter of the Claim of Schreiber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 9, 2006
27 A.D.3d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In the Matter of the Claim of Schreiber

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of NANCY A. SCHREIBER, Appellant. COMMISSIONER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 9, 2006

Citations

27 A.D.3d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 1697
810 N.Y.S.2d 554

Citing Cases

Matter of Snyder

Claimant began to tape record the meeting and, although she was twice told to stop, claimant refused to do…