From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Suggs v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 20, 2005
22 A.D.3d 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

97253.

October 20, 2005.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

John Suggs, Romulus, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Edward Linder of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur.


Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits the unauthorized use of a controlled substance after his urine sample twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. Inasmuch as the misbehavior report, positive test results and supporting documentation, together with the testimony at the hearing, constitute substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt, the determination will not be disturbed ( see Matter of Paige v. Goord, 19 AD3d 908; Matter of Sow v. Selsky, 7 AD3d 903, 904). Furthermore, it was within the province of the Hearing Officer to resolve the credibility issue arising from petitioner's defense that the medications he was taking resulted in the positive test results and the contrary testimony from a technician specialist employed by the manufacturer of the testing equipment that, although not individually tested, the differing chemical and molecular structures between the subject medications and cannabis would not result in a false positive ( see Matter of Figueroa v. Goord, 15 AD3d 705; Matter of Townes v. Goord, 14 AD3d 754, 755).

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Suggs v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 20, 2005
22 A.D.3d 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In the Matter of Suggs v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOHN SUGGS, Petitioner, v. DAVID L. MILLER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 20, 2005

Citations

22 A.D.3d 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 7756
802 N.Y.S.2d 775

Citing Cases

Ruiz v. Goord

Those responses communicated that while one of petitioner's medications would have produced a false positive…

Ramirez v. Goord

We confirm. Petitioner's plea of guilty with an explanation to providing unauthorized legal assistance…