From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Smith v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 13, 2001
286 A.D.2d 793 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Decided and Entered: September 13, 2001.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Robert M. Smith, Malone, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Peter G. Crary of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: Crew III, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Mugglin and, Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner challenges a prison disciplinary determination finding him guilty of providing unauthorized legal assistance and making a false statement. The Attorney-General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Jackson v. Portuondo, 281 A.D.2d 737).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Smith v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 13, 2001
286 A.D.2d 793 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

In the Matter of Smith v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERT M. SMITH, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 13, 2001

Citations

286 A.D.2d 793 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
729 N.Y.S.2d 920

Citing Cases

Steinberg v. Keane

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively…

In the Matter of Scott v. Senkowski

The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been…