From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Sloan v. Knapp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 19, 2004
10 A.D.3d 434 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2004-07081

Decided August 19, 2004.

In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102 to validate a petition designating Samuel H. Sloan as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 14, 2004, for the nomination of the Independence Party as its candidate for the public office of Member of the United States House of Representatives, 10th Congressional District, the petitioner appeals from a final order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), dated August 10, 2004, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Before: Ritter, J.P., H. Miller, S. Miller and Spolzino, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the final order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. Service was improperly made by the petitioner himself upon the respondents ( see CPLR 2103 [a]; Matter of Wein v. Thomas, 51 NY2d 862, 863). "The express provisions of CPLR 2103 (a) may not be ignored or overlooked any more than may the provisions of other statutes defining the methodology of service" ( Miller v. Bank of N.Y. [ Del.], 226 AD2d 507, 508).


Summaries of

In the Matter of Sloan v. Knapp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 19, 2004
10 A.D.3d 434 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

In the Matter of Sloan v. Knapp

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SAMUEL H. SLOAN, Appellant, v. CHARLES E. KNAPP et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 19, 2004

Citations

10 A.D.3d 434 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
780 N.Y.S.2d 738

Citing Cases

Ruffin v. Lion Corp.

The First Department explained that appellate courts in this State have found that service of legal papers by…

Rotanelli v. Westchester Cnty. Bd. of Elections

While the method of service prescribed in the order to show cause does not specifically reference CPLR 2103,…