In Singletary v. Hernandez, 2005 NY Slip Op 51807U, 4 (Sup. Ct., Kings Co. 2005), the court held that the presumption of receipt by the tenant was rebutted where the petitioner testified credibly, at a traverse hearing, that NYCHA sent the T-1 and T-3 notices to an address at which she did not customarily receive mail.
Summary of this case from Baldera v. HernandezNovember 7, 2005.
Public Housing — Rent Subsidy.
In Singletary v. Hernandez, 2005 NY Slip Op 51807U, 4 (Sup. Ct., Kings Co. 2005), the court held that the presumption of receipt by the tenant was rebutted where the petitioner testified credibly, at a traverse hearing, that NYCHA sent the T-1 and T-3 notices to an address at which she did not customarily receive mail.
Summary of this case from Baldera v. HernandezFull title:MATTER OF SINGLETARY v. HERNANDEZ
Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date published: Nov 7, 2005
The determination to terminate a Section 8 rent subsidy becomes final and binding upon receipt of the T-3…
IN RE LOPEZ v. N.Y.C. HSG. AUTH.The determination to terminate a Section 8 rent subsidy becomes final and binding upon receipt of the T-3…