From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Saunders v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 28, 2006
27 A.D.3d 759 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2005-04402.

March 28, 2006.

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the petitioner father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Freeman, J.), dated September 17, 2004, which denied his objection to a prior order of the same court dated May 10, 2004, denying his objections to an order of the same court (Baur, S.M.) dated February 11, 2004, which fixed his child support arrears at $13,800.

Robert Saunders, Brooklyn, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Before: Florio, J.P., Santucci, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly determined that the filing of an objection to the order dated May 10, 2004, was not the proper procedure for seeking review of the Support Magistrate's order fixing the appellant's child support arrears ( see Family Ct Act § 439 [e]; Matter of Davidson v. Wilner, 214 AD2d 563).


Summaries of

In the Matter of Saunders v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 28, 2006
27 A.D.3d 759 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In the Matter of Saunders v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERT SAUNDERS, Appellant, v. MARY SMITH, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 28, 2006

Citations

27 A.D.3d 759 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 2386
815 N.Y.S.2d 609

Citing Cases

Wen Zong Yu v. Hua Fan

The Family Court properly denied the father's objections. In addition to being untimely (see Matter of Ferone…

Wright v. Brown

Contrary to the father's contentions, the Family Court properly construed the prior support order dated…