From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Samuel R. Bautista v. Bautista

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Aug 11, 2011
88 A.D.3d 129 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-08-11

In the Matter of Samuel R. BAUTISTA, a suspended attorney.Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner,v.Samuel R. Bautista, Respondent.

Jorge Dopico, Chief Counsel, Departmental Disciplinary Committee, New York (Scott D. Smith, of counsel), for petitioner.No appearance for respondent.


Jorge Dopico, Chief Counsel, Departmental Disciplinary Committee, New York (Scott D. Smith, of counsel), for petitioner.No appearance for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent Samuel R. Bautista was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Third Judicial Department on July 13, 1982. His last known business address, listed in June 2007, was within the First Judicial Department, and accordingly, this Court maintains jurisdiction over him.

By order dated October 7, 2010, this Court suspended respondent from the practice of law in this State on the grounds of failure to cooperate with the Committee's investigation into two complaints of professional misconduct (22 NYCRR 603.4[e][1][i] ), one claiming that respondent neglected an immigration legal matter, the second, alleging neglect of an immigration matter as well as wrongful use of the client's identity to take out $150,000 in loans, lease an automobile, and obtain a credit card.

The Committee now seeks an order disbarring respondent on the ground that he has been suspended pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4(e)(1)(i) and has failed to appear or apply in writing for a hearing or reinstatement for a period of six months after the date of the interim suspension, as provided in 22 NYCRR 603.4(g).

Since more than six months have elapsed since the date of this Court's suspension order, and respondent has neither appeared nor applied for a hearing or reinstatement, the Committee's motion for an order disbarring respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4(g) should be granted ( Matter of Fletcher, 70 A.D.3d 63, 888 N.Y.S.2d 410 [2009]; Matter of Kennedy, 55 A.D.3d 169, 863 N.Y.S.2d 370 [2008]; Matter of Benzing, 51 A.D.3d 236, 853 N.Y.S.2d 81 [2008]; Matter of Ryans, 46 A.D.3d 71, 843 N.Y.S.2d 79 [2007] ), and respondent's name stricken from the roll of attorneys in the State of New York.

Respondent disbarred and his name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof.

All concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Samuel R. Bautista v. Bautista

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Aug 11, 2011
88 A.D.3d 129 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In the Matter of Samuel R. Bautista v. Bautista

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Samuel R. BAUTISTA, a suspended attorney.Departmental…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 11, 2011

Citations

88 A.D.3d 129 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
928 N.Y.S.2d 505
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 6208