From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Salvador Galdamez v. Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 12, 2004
11 A.D.3d 535 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-10712

October 12, 2004.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Chris Davis, Deputy Superintendent of Security of Otisville Correctional Facility, dated July 24, 2003, which affirmed the determination of a hearing officer, made after a Tier II hearing, finding that the petitioner was guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule and imposing a penalty.

Before: Florio, J.P., Luciano, Schmidt and Rivera, JJ., concur.


Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of the respondent Chris Davis, Superintendent of Security of Otisville Correctional Facility is supported by substantial evidence ( see Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964, 966; Matter of Perez v. Wilmot, 67 NY2d 615, 616-617; Matter of James v. Strack, 214 AD2d 674). Moreover, there is no evidence in the record to support the petitioner's claim that the hearing officer was biased ( see Matter of Hughes v. Suffolk County Dept. of Civ. Serv., 74 NY2d 833; Matter of Martinez v. Scully, 194 AD2d 679).


Summaries of

In the Matter of Salvador Galdamez v. Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 12, 2004
11 A.D.3d 535 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

In the Matter of Salvador Galdamez v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SALVADOR GALDAMEZ, Petitioner, v. CHRIS DAVIS et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 12, 2004

Citations

11 A.D.3d 535 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
782 N.Y.S.2d 649

Citing Cases

Smythe v. Goord

In any event, this contention is without merit. There is no evidence in the record to support the…

Reyes v. Goord

Credibility issues were resolved by the hearing officer, as the trier of fact, and we find no basis to…