From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Ryan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 27, 2001
285 A.D.2d 281 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

August 27, 2001.

DISCIPLINARY proceeding instituted by the Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts. The respondent was admitted to the Bar on October 6, 1982, at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, under the name S. Anita Ryan.

Diana Maxfield Kearse, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Susan Korenberg of counsel), for petitioner.

Before: LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, P.J., CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, DAVID S. RITTER, FRED T. SANTUCCI, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


OPINION ORDER


By opinion and order dated January 27, 1997, ( 229 A.D.2d 148), this court suspended the respondent from the practice of law for one year based upon discipline imposed upon her in the District of Columbia. By further decision and order dated April 6, 2001. the Grievance Committee was authorized to institute and prosecute a second disciplinary proceeding against the respondent and the issues raised were referred to the Honorable Samuel Greenstein, as Special Referee to hear and report.

The petitioner served the respondent with a petition, dated April 19, 2001, containing two charges of professional misconduct against her. The charges emanate from the respondent filing notices of entry of appearance with the Board of Immigration Appeals in four matters while she was a suspended attorney, and failing to cooperate with the petitioner's investigations.

Although personally served with the petition on April 25, 2001, the respondent failed to serve an answer within the time directed by this court's order dated April 6, 2001, or to request an extension of time in which to do so. The respondent is, therefore, in default, and the charges against her must be deemed established. Although served with the motion for a default judgment on May 18, 2001, the respondent has not submitted any reply.

Under the circumstances, the petitioner's motion is granted on the respondent's default, the charges of the petition are deemed admitted, and the respondent is disbarred.

BRACKEN, P.J., O'BRIEN, RITTER, SANTUCCI and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the petitioner's motion to impose discipline upon the respondent based upon her failure to appear or answer is granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent, Sylvia Anita Ryan, is disbarred and her name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

ORDERED that the respondent shall continue to comply with this court's rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys ( see, 22 NYCRR 691.10) ; and it is further,

ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, Sylvia Anita Ryan, is commanded to continue to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding herself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Ryan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 27, 2001
285 A.D.2d 281 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

In the Matter of Ryan

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF SYLVIA ANITA RYAN, A/K/A SYLVIA ANITA RYAN WEBSTER, A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 27, 2001

Citations

285 A.D.2d 281 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
729 N.Y.S.2d 627

Citing Cases

In re Matter Moore

See S.J.C. Rule 4:01, § 1(1), as amended, 430 Mass. 1319 (2000) ("Any lawyer or foreign legal consultant…