From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Robles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 8, 2004
6 A.D.3d 216 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

3329.

Decided April 8, 2004.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Doris Ling-Cohan, J.), entered July 22, 2003, which denied the petition and dismissed this proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Pro Se.

Deborah A. Brenner, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Sullivan, Williams, Friedman, Marlow, JJ.


Respondents provided the pro se petitioner with certain records pursuant to his FOIL request during the pendency of the litigation. Their certification that all responsive documents had been disclosed, and that a diligent search had been conducted for the documents it could not locate, satisfied the requirements of Public Officers Law § 89(3) ( Matter of Rattley v. New York City Police Dept., 96 N.Y.2d 873).

Since respondents claimed no exemption for portions of the data disclosed, there was no need for an in camera inspection of the personnel file at issue ( Matter of Davidson v. Police Dept. of City of N.Y., 197 A.D.2d 466). We have considered petitioner's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Robles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 8, 2004
6 A.D.3d 216 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

In the Matter of Robles

Case Details

Full title:IN RE RAFAEL ROBLES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ELLEN BORAKOVE, ETC., ET…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 8, 2004

Citations

6 A.D.3d 216 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
774 N.Y.S.2d 320