From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Rikki D. Adams v. N.Y. State Div. of Parole

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 10, 2011
89 A.D.3d 1267 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-11-10

In the Matter of Rikki D. ADAMS, Appellant,v.NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF PAROLE, Respondent.


Rikki D. Adams, Rochester, appellant pro se.Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (McGrath, J.), entered February 7, 2011 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole imposing a 24–month time assessment upon the revocation of his parole.

Petitioner was convicted in June 2004 of arson in the third degree and was sentenced to a prison term of 5 to 15 years. He was thereafter released to parole supervision in January 2008. Petitioner was arrested in August 2009 and, at a September 2009 parole revocation hearing, he pleaded guilty to failing to submit to drug and alcohol testing upon demand; his parole was revoked and a 24–month hold was

imposed. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding contending that the time assessment imposed was excessive. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and petitioner now appeals.

This Court has been advised by the Attorney General that, during the pendency of this appeal, petitioner was released to parole supervision in August 2011. Because he is no longer incarcerated and his challenge was solely to the length of the time assessment imposed, the appeal is moot and must be dismissed ( see People ex rel. Phillips v. LaClair, 84 A.D.3d 1606, 924 N.Y.S.2d 589 [2011]; Matter of Smith v. Vann, 53 A.D.3d 945, 861 N.Y.S.2d 526 [2008] ).

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

ROSE, J.P., LAHTINEN, MALONE JR., McCARTHY and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Rikki D. Adams v. N.Y. State Div. of Parole

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 10, 2011
89 A.D.3d 1267 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In the Matter of Rikki D. Adams v. N.Y. State Div. of Parole

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Rikki D. ADAMS, Appellant,v.NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 10, 2011

Citations

89 A.D.3d 1267 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
932 N.Y.S.2d 388
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 7896

Citing Cases

People v. Hamilton

denied10 N.Y.3d 770, 854 N.Y.S.2d 332, 883 N.E.2d 1267 [2008];see also Matter of Bailey v. Joy, 11 Misc.3d…

Gainey v. Stanford

along with the proof that petitioner refused to agree to a payment plan or pay his arrears, provides…