From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Reily

Supreme Court of Georgia
Nov 6, 1981
248 Ga. 391 (Ga. 1981)

Summary

holding void as against public policy an exculpatory clause in an agreement between a patient and a dentist and dental school because it violates public policy to contract away the common law duty of reasonable care

Summary of this case from Innovative Images, LLC v. Summerville

Opinion

SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY NO. 217.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 6, 1981.

Voluntary surrender of license.

Omer W. Franklin, Jr., General Counsel State Bar, Bridget P. Beisner, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.

Michael J. Reily, pro se.


The State Bar initiated disciplinary proceedings against Mr. Reily after he pled guilty to a charge of theft by taking. Prior to a finding of probable cause by the State Disciplinary Board, Mr. Reily requested that he be permitted to voluntarily surrender his license to practice law. Mr. Reily admitted conduct in violation of State Bar Rules, and he stipulated that he may not be readmitted to the State Bar of Georgia except upon compliance with the rules for reinstatement. The State Disciplinary Board recommends accepting Reily's petition for voluntary discipline.

The recommendation of the Board is hereby approved. The court orders that the license of Robert E. Reily, III, to practice law be surrendered.

Petition for voluntary surrender of license to practice law granted. All the Justices concur.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 6, 1981.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Reily

Supreme Court of Georgia
Nov 6, 1981
248 Ga. 391 (Ga. 1981)

holding void as against public policy an exculpatory clause in an agreement between a patient and a dentist and dental school because it violates public policy to contract away the common law duty of reasonable care

Summary of this case from Innovative Images, LLC v. Summerville

holding that it was against state policy to allow a licensed dentist to rely on a patient's contractual release that purported to relieve him of his duty to exercise a reasonable degree of skill and care during treatment

Summary of this case from Key v. Ga. Dep't of Admin. Servs.

explaining that Georgia courts "exercise extreme caution in declaring a contract void as against public policy"

Summary of this case from Neibert v. Computer Scis. Corp.

noting that clinic patients agree to treatment that “proceed more slowly” and may not be able to “insist on complete treatment”

Summary of this case from Franza v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.
Case details for

In the Matter of Reily

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF REILY

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Nov 6, 1981

Citations

248 Ga. 391 (Ga. 1981)
282 S.E.2d 903

Citing Cases

Curmode v. Alsbrooks

Curmode argues that the trial court erred in ruling that the exculpatory clause in the service agreement is…

Omstead v. BPG Inspection, LLC

There, we held that "it is against the public policy of this state to allow one who procures a license to…