From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Regency

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Dec 5, 1951
192 F.2d 574 (3d Cir. 1951)

Opinion

No. 10504.

Argued November 23, 1951.

Decided December 5, 1951.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; Guy L. Fake, Judge.

Bertram K. Wolfe, Philadelphia, Pa. (Eichmann Seiden, Jersey City, N.J., on the brief), for appellants, Jean G.L. Cassel van Doorn and Marij V. Cassel van Doorn.

Paul T. Huckin, Englewood, N.J., for appellee.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.


We have examined the briefs and record in this case and have considered the arguments advanced by the appellants. We perceive no error of law and the findings of fact made by the referee find full support in the evidence. Consequently the judgment of the court below will be affirmed. 96 F. Supp. 535.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Regency

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Dec 5, 1951
192 F.2d 574 (3d Cir. 1951)
Case details for

In the Matter of Regency

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of REGENCY, Inc., Bankrupt Jean G.L. Cassel van Doorn and…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Dec 5, 1951

Citations

192 F.2d 574 (3d Cir. 1951)