From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Quinones v. Lopez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 2004
13 A.D.3d 636 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-06088, 2003-06089.

December 27, 2004.

In related custody and visitation proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals (1) from an order of protection of the Family Court, Queens County (De Phillips, J.), dated June 11, 2003, and (2), as limited by his brief, from stated portions of an order of the same court, also dated June 11, 2003, which, inter alia, in effect, denied his cross motion to modify a prior order of the same court dated October 22, 2002, to afford him unsupervised visitation.

Before: Florio, J.P., Krausman, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the first order dated June 11, 2003, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the second order dated June 11, 2003, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The father failed to meet his burden of showing a material change in circumstances sufficient to warrant a modification of a prior visitation order ( see Matter of Heuthe v. McLaren, 1 AD3d 514; Matter of Goldberg v. Goldberg, 300 AD2d 585). Accordingly, the Family Court properly, in effect, denied his request to afford unsupervised visitation.

The parties' remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Quinones v. Lopez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 2004
13 A.D.3d 636 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

In the Matter of Quinones v. Lopez

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MICHELLE QUINONES, Respondent, v. LOUIS LOPEZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 27, 2004

Citations

13 A.D.3d 636 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
786 N.Y.S.2d 347

Citing Cases

Sitzer v. Fay

However, we find that the Family Court properly granted the father's motion to dismiss the mother's petition…

In the Matter of Danvers v. Clarke

The father appeals from both orders. The Referee properly dismissed the first petition, as the father failed…