From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Pulci v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 2, 2003
2 A.D.3d 124 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2337.

December 2, 2003.

Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated March 23, 2002, which, after an administrative hearing, found petitioner guilty of striking his wife and daughter and causing injury to both, imposed forfeiture of 30 vacation days in addition to 11 days suspension without pay, and placed petitioner on dismissal probation for one year, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [Joan Madden, J.], entered August 26, 2002), dismissed, without costs.

Howard B. Sterinbach, for Petitioner.

Scott Shorr, for Respondent.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Rosenberger, Lerner, Friedman, JJ.


The administrative determination is supported by substantial evidence — particularly, the testimony of two responding police officers and the transcript of a police interview with petitioner's wife ( Matter of Wagner v. Kerik, 298 A.D.2d 322). The penalty imposed does not shock our sense of fairness ( id.).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

In re Pulci v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 2, 2003
2 A.D.3d 124 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

In re Pulci v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:IN RE CHARLES PULCI, ETC., Petitioner, v. RAYMOND W. KELLY, ETC., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 2, 2003

Citations

2 A.D.3d 124 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
767 N.Y.S.2d 604