From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Philip C. Prothro

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Oct 5, 2011
208 N.J. 340 (N.J. 2011)

Opinion

2011-10-5

In the Matter of Philip C. PROTHRO, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 025562004).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 11–061, concluding that PHILIP C. PROTHRO of JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2005, should be disciplined for violating RPC 8.1(a)(knowingly making a false statement of material fact to a disciplinary authority), and RPC 8.4(c)(conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation);

And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that a censure is the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent's unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that PHILIP C. PROTHRO is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Philip C. Prothro

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Oct 5, 2011
208 N.J. 340 (N.J. 2011)
Case details for

In the Matter of Philip C. Prothro

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Philip C. PROTHRO, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Oct 5, 2011

Citations

208 N.J. 340 (N.J. 2011)
27 A.3d 1210

Citing Cases

In re Nadler

When Choy first spoke to respondent about the grievance, respondent claimed that the inaccurate submission to…

In re Nadler

For his misconduct, Tan received a reprimand, with the Board and the Court taking into account his youth and…