From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Perez v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 12, 2003
306 A.D.2d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

93205

Calendar Date: May 14, 2003.

June 12, 2003.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Leo Perez, Dannemora, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting possession of marihuana and smuggling. As related in the misbehavior report, a correction officer observed petitioner on the bleachers in the facility's gymnasium passing a hand-rolled cigarette to another inmate. The cigarette was confiscated and subsequent laboratory testing identified its contents as marihuana.

Included in the evidence presented at petitioner's disciplinary hearing were the misbehavior report, the positive laboratory test results, and the identification testimony of the correction officer who had observed petitioner sharing a cigarette with fellow inmates. The misbehavior report was written by this officer and endorsed by the correction officers who confiscated the cigarette and conducted the laboratory testing, respectively. We find this sufficient to constitute substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see Matter of Anderson v. Selsky, 297 A.D.2d 867; Matter of Powell v. Goord, 293 A.D.2d 846). Petitioner's testimony and that of his inmate witness asserting petitioner's innocence presented issues of credibility which the Hearing Officer was free to resolve against petitioner (see Matter of Sanchez v. Goord, 290 A.D.2d 623, 624). The remaining issues raised herein, to the extent that they have been preserved for our review, are without merit.

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Perez v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 12, 2003
306 A.D.2d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

In the Matter of Perez v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF LEO PEREZ, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as Commissioner…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 12, 2003

Citations

306 A.D.2d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
759 N.Y.S.2d 920