From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Penn v. Penn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 27, 2005
19 A.D.3d 700 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-01271.

June 27, 2005.

In a proceeding, inter alia, for visitation pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Seiden, R.), dated January 13, 2004, which, after a hearing, granted his petition only to the extent of awarding him additional visitation.

David M. Shapiro, Bronx, N.Y., for appellant, and appellant pro se.

Before: Florio, J.P., Adams, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the father's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted ( see Anders v. California, 386 US 738).

The appellant has not raised any nonfrivolous issue in his supplemental pro se brief.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Penn v. Penn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 27, 2005
19 A.D.3d 700 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In the Matter of Penn v. Penn

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of STEPHEN PENN, Appellant, v. INGRID PENN, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 27, 2005

Citations

19 A.D.3d 700 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
797 N.Y.S.2d 296