From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Mollye S

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 4, 2006
28 A.D.3d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2005-01092, 2005-01095.

April 4, 2006.

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals (1) from a decision of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Genchi, J.), dated December 2, 2004, and (2), as limited by his brief, from stated portions of an order of disposition of the same court dated January 20, 2005, made after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, which, inter alia, found that he neglected the subject child and directed that he have only supervised and therapeutic visitation with the subject child. The appeal from the order of disposition brings up for review an "order of fact-finding and disposition" of the same court dated January 12, 2005.

Francis P. Chery, West Babylon, N.Y., for appellant.

Christine Malafi, County Attorney, Central Islip, N.Y. (Andrew G. Tarantino, Jr., of counsel), for respondent.

Robert C. Mitchell, Central Islip, N.Y. (Alison M. Anderson of counsel), Law Guardian for the child.

Before: Krausman, J.P., Mastro, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the appeal from the decision dated December 2, 2004, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from a decision (see Schicchi v. J.A. Green Constr. Corp., 100 AD2d 509); and it is further,

Ordered that the order of disposition dated January 20, 2005, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The finding of neglect against the father was supported by a preponderance of the evidence which demonstrated that the subject child's physical, mental, or emotional condition was impaired or was in imminent danger of becoming impaired as a result of the father's behavior and mental illness (see Family Ct Act 1012 [f]; Matter of Angel Marie L., 5 AD3d 773; Matter of Essence V., 283 AD2d 652; Matter of Danielle M., 151 AD2d 240).

The father's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Mollye S

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 4, 2006
28 A.D.3d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In the Matter of Mollye S

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MOLLYE S., an Infant. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 4, 2006

Citations

28 A.D.3d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 2550
812 N.Y.S.2d 142

Citing Cases

Kiemiyah M. v. Admin. for Children's Servs.

Moreover, the mother's accounts of what she believed she had seen became more vivid and unrealistic over…

In the Matter of Amber Gold J. (anonymous).Admin. for Children's Serv.

The finding of neglect against the mother was supported by a preponderance of the evidence which demonstrated…