From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Miller v. DeMaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 3, 2003
1 A.D.3d 363 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2003-07202

November 3, 2003.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent to reinstate the complaint in an action entitled Miller v. Radder, in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, under Index No. 8837/02.

William T. Martin Associates, Brooklyn, N.Y., for petitioners.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General, New York, N.Y. (Constantine A. Speres of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, LEO F. McGINITY, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION JUDGMENT

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought ( see Matter of Legal Aid Society of Sullivan County v. Scheinman, 53 N.Y.2d 12, 16). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

SANTUCCI, J.P., FRIEDMANN, McGINITY and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Miller v. DeMaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 3, 2003
1 A.D.3d 363 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

In the Matter of Miller v. DeMaro

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JANET MILLER, ET AL., petitioners, v. JOSEPH A. DeMARO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 3, 2003

Citations

1 A.D.3d 363 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
766 N.Y.S.2d 584