From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Mikita

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 1, 2003
832 A.2d 317 (N.J. 2003)

Opinion

D-188 September Term 2002

October 1, 2003


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 03-110, concluding that WILLIAM P. MIKITA, JR., of WOODBRIDGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1994, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.5(c) (failure to provide client with written statement of outcome on conclusion of contingent fee matter), RPC 5.3(b) (failure to supervise non-lawyer assistants), RPC 8.4(c) (dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WILLIAM P. MIKITA, JR., is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Mikita

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 1, 2003
832 A.2d 317 (N.J. 2003)
Case details for

In the Matter of Mikita

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM P. MIKITA, JR., AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Oct 1, 2003

Citations

832 A.2d 317 (N.J. 2003)
832 A.2d 317