From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Michael Chavis v. Helf

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 23, 2011
89 A.D.3d 1352 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-11-23

In the Matter of Michael CHAVIS, Appellant,v.Jeffrey HELF, as Facility Parole Officer, et al., Respondents.


Michael Chavis, Attica, appellant pro se.Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Robert M. Goldfarb of counsel), for respondents.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Melkonian, J.), entered April 5, 2011 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondents' motion to dismiss the petition.

Petitioner commenced the instant proceeding by order to show cause to challenge the withholding of his good time allowance. The order to show cause provided that the order and supporting documentation were to be served by ordinary first class mail upon respondents and the Attorney General on or before January 7, 2011. Petitioner thereafter failed to serve the papers upon respondents. Respondents, in turn, moved to dismiss the proceeding for lack of personal jurisdiction. Supreme Court granted the motion and petitioner appeals.

We affirm. The failure of an inmate to serve papers as directed by an order to show cause requires the dismissal of the petition on jurisdictional grounds, absent a showing by the inmate that imprisonment presented an obstacle to compliance ( see Matter of Gantt v. Lape, 83 A.D.3d 1349, 920 N.Y.S.2d 923 [2011]; Matter of Pettus v. Wetmore, 81 A.D.3d 1019, 1020, 915 N.Y.S.2d 770 [2011] ). Here, petitioner's affidavit of service indicates that he did not attempt service of any papers on respondents, and respondent Department of Corrections and Community Supervision submitted a sworn affidavit from an employee indicating that it had not been served with the pleadings. Accordingly, Supreme Court properly granted respondents' motion and dismissed the petition.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

SPAIN, J.P., ROSE, KAVANAGH, GARRY and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Michael Chavis v. Helf

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 23, 2011
89 A.D.3d 1352 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In the Matter of Michael Chavis v. Helf

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Michael CHAVIS, Appellant,v.Jeffrey HELF, as Facility…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 23, 2011

Citations

89 A.D.3d 1352 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8530
932 N.Y.S.2d 923

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. Fischer

Supreme Court granted the motion and this appeal ensued. We affirm. “The failure of an inmate to serve papers…

Davis v. Evans

We affirm. Where, as here, there has been no showing that petitioner's imprisonment presented an obstacle to…