From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Medina v. Figueroa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 7, 2005
16 A.D.3d 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-02544.

March 7, 2005.

In related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act articles 6 and 8, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Sammarco, J.), dated February 27, 2004, which, inter alia, dismissed her petitions. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v. California ( 386 US 738), in which he moves to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute this appeal.

Before: H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, S. Miller and Fisher, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the mother's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on her appeal. Thus, counsel's application for leave to withdraw is granted ( cf. Anders v. California, 386 US 738; People v. Paige, 54 AD2d 631; People v. Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).


Summaries of

In the Matter of Medina v. Figueroa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 7, 2005
16 A.D.3d 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In the Matter of Medina v. Figueroa

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LISSETTE MEDINA, Appellant, v. ALEXANDER FIGUEROA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 7, 2005

Citations

16 A.D.3d 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
790 N.Y.S.2d 401

Citing Cases

Randolph v. Nevels

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We have reviewed the record and agree…

In re Matter of Jose

We have reviewed the record and agree with the father's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous…