From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of McManus

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 10, 2002
810 A.2d 1074 (N.J. 2002)

Summary

rejecting double jeopardy and due process challenges under both New Jersey and United States Constitutions

Summary of this case from Bailey v. Atl. Cnty. Justice Facility

Opinion

December 10, 2002


ORDER

WILLIAM E. McMANUS, II, of MORRISTOWN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, having pleaded guilty to willfully attempting to evade income tax, in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. 7201, and failure to file an income tax return, in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. 7203, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED pursuant to Rule 1:20-13(b)(1), that WILLIAM E. McMANUS, II, is temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the final resolution of ethics proceedings against him, effective immediately and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that WILLIAM E. McMANUS, II, be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that WILLIAM E. McMANUS, II, comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.


Summaries of

In the Matter of McManus

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 10, 2002
810 A.2d 1074 (N.J. 2002)

rejecting double jeopardy and due process challenges under both New Jersey and United States Constitutions

Summary of this case from Bailey v. Atl. Cnty. Justice Facility

rejecting double jeopardy and due process challenges under both New Jersey and United States Constitutions

Summary of this case from Southerland v. Cnty. of Hudson
Case details for

In the Matter of McManus

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM E. MCMANUS, II, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Dec 10, 2002

Citations

810 A.2d 1074 (N.J. 2002)
810 A.2d 1074

Citing Cases

Southerland v. Cnty. of Hudson

The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit addressed a comprehensive challenge to the VCCB…

Bailey v. Atl. Cnty. Justice Facility

The Court cannot rule out that Plaintiff himself was subjected to the commissary surcharge and, thus, his…